Unfortunately, this passage is based on understanding basic concepts from Genesis, concepts that are alluded to in the rest of the Book of Romans: ...death reigned from the time of Adam to the time of Moses, even over those who did not sin by breaking a command....if, by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man, how much more will those who receive God's abundant provision of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man, Jesus Christ! (5:14 & 17). As a Jewish man trained in the Scriptures from childhood, Paul took for granted that his contemporaries would understand these concepts. We do not have the background in Scriptural concepts that Paul and those of his day took for granted.
Nevertheless, Carl Jung is supposed to have said that a naked man nailed to a cross is perhaps the deepest archetypal symbol in the Western psyche. According to Richard Rohr in Things Hidden: Scripture as Spirituality, Jung's statement has nothing to do with traditional "atonement theories," but rather everything to do with our inner lives and our attempts to make sense out of the tragic history of our world.
Rohr, a Franciscan friar, is also a trained psychologist who has spent many years doing grief work with people, as well as taking men through traditional "male initiation rites" to explore their meaning. I want to cull out select passages from his book that have helped me to understand much deeper meanings of the cross than those I could never accept -- namely those of an "angry" God awaiting blood sacrifice to appease his "justice." I should also explain that I had never heard these ideas until I started listening to non-denominational or Protestant preachers on the radio and tv. Although I learned a great deal from these (mostly) men, and although I was willing to listen to almost every one of them to learn, something in me just could not accept their ideas of 'divine atonement.' For one thing, that idea makes God a 'reactionary' rather than a Divine Being of Free Will. Unlike an angry parent taking out his own frustration on the child, God was never 'surprised' by man's disobedience; He knew the end of the story from the beginning.
Because I could not accept their idea of a perpetually "angry" God, I had to do a lot of praying and soul searching to find a better explanation. Imagine my joy when I gradually began to understand through the Bible a deeper picture -- and finally, finding Richard Rohr's gradual unfolding of the mystery of pain and grief, a much better and more detailed study than I had reached on my own. Please understand that all that follows here is from his book, taken without quotes:
I would define suffering very simply as "whenever you are not in control." If religion cannot find a meaning for human suffering, humanity is in major trouble. All healthy religion shows you what to do with your pain. Great religion shows you what to do with the absurd, the tragic, the nonsensical, the unjust. If we do not transform our pain, we will most assuredly transmit it.
If we cannot find a way to make our wounds into sacred wounds, we invariably become negative or bitter. Indeed, there are bitter people everywhere, inside and outside of the church. As they go through life, the hurts, disappointments, betrayals, abandonments, the burden of their own sinfulness and brokenness all pile up, and they do not know where to put it.
If there isn't some way to find some deeper meaning to our suffering, to find that God is somehow in it, and can even use it for good (my emphasis), we will normally close up and close down. The natural movement of the ego is to protect itself so as not to be hurt again.
Biblical revelation is about transforming history and individuals so that we don't just keep handing the pain onto the next generation. That 'tit-for-tat' 'quid-pro-quo' mentality has controlled most of human history. [My note: this is exactly what the "atonement theories" are based on, and is exactly the opposite, in my mind, of Biblical revelation.] Exporting our unresolved hurt [my note: think Hitler here] is almost the underlying story line of human history, so you see why people still need healthy spirituality and healthy religion. The Biblical narrative is saying that there is coherence inside of the seeming incoherence of history. The Jewish people believed that our smaller stories have a Bigger Story holding them together.....
Let's look at the "Fall" in Genesis 3: The "Fall" is not simply something that happened in one historical moment to Adam and Eve. It's something that happens in all moments and in all lives. It must happen and will happen to all of us. In fact, as the English mystic Julian of Norwich said, "First the fall, and then the recovery from the fall, and both are the mercy of God." It is in falling down that we learn almost everything that happens spiritually. As many of the parables seem to say, you have to lose it (or know you don't have it) before you can find it and celebrate fittingly.
The Bible presents us stories in 'little theater' to prepare us for the Big Theater, teaching us, in effect, that it's not just here; it's everywhere. It's not just this man or woman; it's every man and every woman.....If the text is truly inspired, it will always be revealing "the patterns that are always true," even and most especially here and now -- in me, and not just back there in them.
We start with unitive consciousness, and eventually, the split happens. It has to happen. We will eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and suffer 'the wound of knowledge.' We will get suspicious of ourselves and of everything else. We will doubt. That's called the state of alienation and many live their whole lives there....the perfect metaphor for this new split universe, this intense awareness of ourselves as separate and cut off, is that "they realized that they were naked." Today we would probably call it primal shame. Every human being seems to have it in some form, that deep sense of being inadequate, insecure, separate, judged, and apart....
There is no medicine for this existential shame, apart from Someone who knows all of me and loves me anyway. One who knows me in my nakedness and loves me despite and maybe even because, as Therese of Lisieux believed.....
Salvation is only secondarily assuring you of an eternal life; it is first of all giving you that life now, and saying, "If now, then also later" and that becomes your deep inner certitude! If God would accept me now when I am clearly unworthy, then why would God change his policy later? You can begin to rest, enjoy and love life.
I